609
The world map is changing: The UN has backed replacing the 500-year-old Mercator projection with the accurate Equal Earth projection (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 days ago by to c/interestingasfuck@lemmy.world
210 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 3 days ago* (29 children)

how is Canada smaller than the USA in this "equal earth" map when it's supposed to display true areas? or is the pic in this post just shitty?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
    •
  • [–] 36 points 3 days ago (10 children)

    Canada (without the various arctic islands) is considerably smaller than the contiguous (sans Alaska and Hawaii) US.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    We're repeatedly told in school and all throughout our media that Canada is the "second largest land mass in the world". Is that not true?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    Yes it is, but you have to include all of those islands, in particular Baffin island. If you just look at the contiguous land masses, the US is bigger, which is why it looks bigger on this projection. If you dragged all those islands together into Canada, then Canada would look slightly bigger, because it is slightly bigger.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Land mass or country? Because the Americas make us the second largest land mass with Eurasia and Africa because the largest.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (3 children)

    Isn't Africa connected to Eurasia? So we have the Americas and AfroEurasia plus some islands. Which is why "continents" has no meaning and is another social construct unless you divide them in a way that makes zero sense to anyone who isn't a geologist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    We should divide the continents in:

    Continents: the actual land, so we have the Americas (i'd count them as one as they are almost one), AfroEuroAsia

    Sub continents: their definition is cultural so we have north and south america, Africa, Europe, Asia and Oceania

    Don't take anything too seriously, i thought about this on two feets around 2 years ago and forgot about that until now

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    I know at the end of the day it doesn't really matter, but it always rubbed me the wrong way when Europeans claim that The Americas are one continent because it's one connected landmass, but somehow Europe is it's own continent. North/South America at least came from different super continents and only recently collided. Europe (minus the Balkans) and Asia (minus Arabian and Indian peninsulas) have been together since at least Pangaea.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago*

    They’re about the same size. In this image, Canada’s northern islands are all spread out to show them inside their Mercator projections. You have to mentally add them to the large mass.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 days ago (14 children)

    Because Canada is ~10% smaller than the US.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago* (9 children)

    Canada is slightly larger than the US in total area. The US is a tiny bit larger when you just count land-area.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago (8 children)

    Well yes, Canada is larger if you count the ocean as part of Canada lmao

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago* (4 children)

    Canada total area: 9,984,670 km^2

    USA total area: 9,866,624 km^2

    Have a look a the respective 2nd digits of those numbers and consider that 9 is indeed bigger than 8.

    Source: Wikipedia.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Total land area: 9,093,507

    You are counting ocean as part of Canada, a thing not represented on maps.

    Imagine being this condescending and wrong.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Smaller in area?

    According to wikipedia, these are the total areas of both countries:

    USA: 9,833,520 km2 Canada: 9,984,670 km2

    I am certain I am just misunderstanding the system behind this new projection but reading it is supposed to display accurate area, it seems Canada should show up bigger.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •