▲ 85 ▼ President Aoun Asks US to Intervene as Israel Kills Another Four Civilians in South Lebanon (news.antiwar.com) submitted 1 week ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml 30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (11 children) Should ask Turkey or Egypt. Maybe Iran. permalink fedilink source hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] Maeve@kbin.earth -16 points 1 week ago (10 children) Oh look, a member of the He-man Women Hater Club is here. Bye Alfalfa. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago Please just go outside holy fuck permalink fedilink source parent [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (8 children) You should probably keep respectable disagreement to the thread, but considering you weren't capable of having that kind of discussion there, I doubt you'll be able to have it here either. I'm sorry that you support abuse/ domestic violence, at least on the part of one gender. Do better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -5 points 1 week ago (7 children) The guy was the abuser, and that you can't self-reflect casts doubts on your words elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (6 children) Again, there is a place for this and its that thread. I'm not going to report you but expect what you are doing is bannable here. You have many options in terms of threads you can pick up on to make that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -4 points 1 week ago (5 children) Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children) Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading. But whatever. I you'd like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Maeve@kbin.earth -16 points 1 week ago (10 children) Oh look, a member of the He-man Women Hater Club is here. Bye Alfalfa. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago Please just go outside holy fuck permalink fedilink source parent [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (8 children) You should probably keep respectable disagreement to the thread, but considering you weren't capable of having that kind of discussion there, I doubt you'll be able to have it here either. I'm sorry that you support abuse/ domestic violence, at least on the part of one gender. Do better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -5 points 1 week ago (7 children) The guy was the abuser, and that you can't self-reflect casts doubts on your words elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (6 children) Again, there is a place for this and its that thread. I'm not going to report you but expect what you are doing is bannable here. You have many options in terms of threads you can pick up on to make that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -4 points 1 week ago (5 children) Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children) Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading. But whatever. I you'd like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago Please just go outside holy fuck permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (8 children) You should probably keep respectable disagreement to the thread, but considering you weren't capable of having that kind of discussion there, I doubt you'll be able to have it here either. I'm sorry that you support abuse/ domestic violence, at least on the part of one gender. Do better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -5 points 1 week ago (7 children) The guy was the abuser, and that you can't self-reflect casts doubts on your words elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (6 children) Again, there is a place for this and its that thread. I'm not going to report you but expect what you are doing is bannable here. You have many options in terms of threads you can pick up on to make that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -4 points 1 week ago (5 children) Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children) Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading. But whatever. I you'd like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -5 points 1 week ago (7 children) The guy was the abuser, and that you can't self-reflect casts doubts on your words elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (6 children) Again, there is a place for this and its that thread. I'm not going to report you but expect what you are doing is bannable here. You have many options in terms of threads you can pick up on to make that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -4 points 1 week ago (5 children) Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children) Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading. But whatever. I you'd like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (6 children) Again, there is a place for this and its that thread. I'm not going to report you but expect what you are doing is bannable here. You have many options in terms of threads you can pick up on to make that comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -4 points 1 week ago (5 children) Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children) Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading. But whatever. I you'd like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -4 points 1 week ago (5 children) Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children) Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading. But whatever. I you'd like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children) Well there should probably be something in there about stalking/ briggading. But whatever. I you'd like to pick up the discussion in that thread, there are a number of points you can pick up on. More than happy to entertain this, but it really should happen over there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (3 children) You didn't listen there, you're not listening, here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children) I listened plenty. Its all there, in writing, effectively immutable because this is the fediverse. I don't think you did anything other than throw insults. I can provide receipts. Can you accept that if any one as an aggressor, including a woman, initiates violence, and especially, if that person continues to climb the escalation ladder, that they're in the wrong? That it doesn't matter what their gender is. If you or any one initiates and escalates violence, that person is in the wrong? Because from what I could tell, the thread was basically one camp apologizing for a woman initiating and then escalating a violent situation. No one making the accusations of misogyny or sexism could really address the fact that the aggressor in the scenario, self-acknowledged being the aggressor and initiator in her Facebook post. She said she did what the people saying that she was the aggressor did. Apologism for violence is reactionary. No gender or sex has a monopoly on violence. The aggressor or initiator is the one who is wrong. The one who steps up the escalation ladder through more extreme forms of violence is wrong. The one who tries to de-escalate is right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I rest my case. Your opinion is questionable, despite a lucky guess. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) What do you mean by a lucky guess? I'm unclear what you mean. Also, you've made no case. If your case is "I believe I'm right, therefore I'm right", I genuinely hope the woman involved doesn't take your advice or share your worldview, because if so, she's going to be in trouble with the law. From what I could tell, you are apologizing for gendered violence and promoting a sexist world view that removes women of agency when it comes to the use of force and violence when it comes to the escalation of use of violence. permalink fedilink source parent