you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I honestly think trying to define programming as art is just an attempt to unnecessarily elevate it. Programming is utilitarian. It is meant for a specific practical purpose. It does not reveal a shared human experience the way a movie, book, or game does. I have no need to convince myself, a professional software engineer of this because I am perfectly happy accepting that what I do is useful and do not need to try to put myself in a category with artists.

All the author is saying is that people enjoy programming. I also enjoy eating. Is that an art? I even have my own "eating style" in that I like to eat food in specific order, combine two items into one bite, the way I build a bite, etc. But I'd never try to elevate it because I'm a normal person who doesn't waste brainpower trying to make myself feel special.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    If you're defining programming as simply translating an algorithm. Into code as is, sure it isn't art. However, designing abstractions and the structure which allows said algorithm to work with various parts of a program seamlessly and beautifully can be art.

  • source
  • parent