chgxvjh comments on Just saw $6 per gallon at the chevron on my way to work.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Kinda makes sense that storing image would be a subset of storing videos.

parent

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

it makes sense yeah but most of the space savings is from keeping one frame and then saving the next several frames as a series of just deltas. plus there's stuff you notice when it's moving but not so much when it's still. between that and the jpeg-xl benchmarks i'm comfortable speculating that there's probably maybe something to the idea of having separate lossy image and video codecs.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

You are still storing a key frame every couple of seconds or so

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

you're right but even then i kinda think there are different things to optimize for. i found a benchmark i edited into my original post but honestly who the hell knows

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago*

To me it's honestly a lot of it's the same picture

And the results in data compression aren't different enough to use anything with less wide software support.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent