173
US judge ruled AI-generated child sexual abuse material is protected by First Amendment. (reason.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by to c/technology@lemmy.world
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1368970/judge-ruled-ai-generated-child-sex-abuse-material-is-protected-by-first-amendment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

Odd because the U.S. doesn't have this. Idk the original comment implied it did.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    In the US it's more of a state-by-state basis. Texas for example has SB20 which, while targeting AI generated child pornography, is worded in a way that would also target a manga hand-drawn in Procreate. Whether or not this was done on purpose is something you can decide for yourself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •