you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 hours ago (1 child)

It's fine if you have ample fields and a low population with an excess of food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    It's mainly there as a form of farm subsidy that bypasses restrictions thrown up by long-existing trade agreements. Canada provides no farm subsidies besides underwriting crop and moisture insurance premiums to an extent, but the US has a long history of flouting these restrictions.

    As usual. Coincidentally it provides money for equipment manufacturers and inputs providers like Deere and Cargill. But I'm sure that's just a happy coincidence of providing "food security".

  • source
  • parent