Despite no one being hurt, he has spent the last two decades incarcerated without hope on a discredited Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) jail term – until now.

Their decision to give him back his freedom came weeks before prime minister Andy Burnham announced he would finally end the injustice of IPP jail terms before the end of this parliament.

It also came shortly before the United Nations (UN) issued a landmark legal opinion which declared his detention – and that of a number of other prisoners serving draconian IPP sentences – is arbitrary and unlawful. A major legal challenge over their imprisonment was this week lodged at the High Court.

He was originally told he must serve a minimum of two years and six months for the robbery, committed in December 2005. Despite remaining drug-free for many years in prison, he was repeatedly refused parole because of his disruptive behaviour as he grew frustrated over his treatment, which he characterised as “cripplingly cruel”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 3 points 2 days ago*

I can only speak to the coverage I have seen them do. I'm sure they might be biased on some things, but so far all the coverage I've seen them do has been progressive and factual.

When it comes to trans rights stuff, they've done better coverage than The Guardian, and as a general source of news they've been fine to me.

They're not an activist paper, like Novara Media and The Canary, so I go to those on some activist topics too, though I take them with a grain of salt sometimes as they tend to more passionate and therefore biased on some things.

The BBC has platformed horrible people and done a lot of bad coverage over the last few years, so I've lost hope in them. If I read them, it's with a big grain of salt.

The Daily Mail, The Telegraph are obviously awful and disgusting to read, so if I do read them, it's with a 10 foot pole.

If you're unhappy with The Independent, what paper do you read?

  • source
  • parent