you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

Why call it anything? UTC-7 or -8 are explicit, less confusing internationally & shorter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    Because UTC-7 and UTC-8 are also wrong. The label "Pacific Time" means, in the United States and Mexico, the civil time standard that observes standard time at UTC-8 and daylight saving time at UTC-7. You cannot call this standard merely "UTC-8" because then it's wrong half of the year.

    It is important to note that by calling year-round UTC-7 "Pacific Time", British Columbia and Yukon are the ones stepping out of the programme to do something idiosyncratic. The rest of the Pacific Time Zone (Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, California, and Baja California) has a greater population than the entirety of Canada. There are approximately 56 million residents of the non-Canadian portion of the Pacific Time Zone, where standard time is UTC-8, compared to 5 million in the Canadian portion, which is UTC-7.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    No that's what I mean, once you have a fixed timezone there is no need for naming that timezone anything at all, it can be referred to by its UTC offset

    It's something that regularly gets under my skin when people announce events like this:

    extensive list of times with timezones such as PDT, EDT, BST etc. for a single event

    Instead of all of this, a single UTC offset would be so much clearer

  • source
  • parent