If we were to close our eyes and pretend that the conversation around AI hadn't happened the way it did, and the training had only involved things people generally agreed were fair game, one could imagine a world where we largely used them as "that person who can tell you what to search for" or clarifies your understanding.
It's not intelligent in the way anyone means, but it's theoretically capable of being a better interface for a search engine.
Edit: it's whole thing is language manipulation. I forgot that I've written technical documents and had it summarize or explain them back to me. Anything it gets wrong is something I can bet a lazy or rushed human would also get caught by, so I clarify that point. Not proofreading, since I'm not asking for feedback. Just "did the words convey the information well enough for a statistical model to properly contextualize".