142
Water cuts are coming for Arizona. Is your salad on the chopping block? (www.nbcnews.com)
submitted 1 day ago by to c/politics@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

That's good news. This is data from a few years ago for Denver:

https://denverite.com/2019/05/06/denverites-can-use-120-million-gallons-a-day-to-water-their-lawns/

As far as the city's water use is concerned, Denver Water estimates lawn irrigation accounts for 50 percent of single-family homes' total use. Single-family homes use 47 percent of all the city's water sales, according to a 2011 study. If that's still true today, lawn watering uses nearly a quarter of every drop Denver Water sells to the city.

And that's potable water, too. I mean, what are we even doing?

It's good for cities to do their part, but AFAIK, we need to focus on agriculture - what crops are raised for what, the techniques they use, what we are putting on our plates, etc, since in Colorado that is 90% of the usage, while municipal use is 7%. Yes, it's rather stupid to use 25% of that municipal water and spray it on a non-native plant for decorative purposes, but we are going to have to rethink what we eat and how we make that food...

https://coloradosun.com/2026/03/16/is-most-of-colorados-water-used-for-agriculture/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 child)

    And that’s potable water, too.

    Cities are hard-pressed to maintain ONE network of water pipes.

    I mean, what are we even doing?

    I'd say "barely coping"

    Here's the bare facts: bungalows cost more in infrastructure maintenance than they ever pay in taxes. More frontage means more pipes and wires and conduit.

    Think about how much of your area is bungalows, and understand the city is never recouping the cost of keeping that running in those areas, and is thus robbing funds from more dense areas to pay for the suburbs.

    Is your city raising property taxes? No? Then it's not even breaking even now, let alone with a second non-potable water network.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 16 hours ago*

    Property taxes did increase quite a bit in recent years. It actually caused quite an uproar.

    As for potable water, I get what you are saying there as far as public infrastructure. I believe until fairly recently having rain barrels was not permitted in Colorado. I believe they are allowed for limited use now. I don't know about the law when it comes to doing things to your own house to, say, run graywater into your garden.

    I don't know if things are getting overturned, but you'd hear stories about HOAs going after homeowners for a brown lawn (apparently they don't have much to stand on in Colorado now, so if they know their rights, they'll tell the HOA where to stick it), even as there are water restrictions. And it was only recent law that forbids HOAs from preventing homeowners from using xeriscaping.

    That is so wild to me, since these kinds of problems have been apparent for decades in Colorado.

    I guess it's good to know that HOAs and the state can no longer actively impede people from doing the right thing - using rainbarrels and xeriscaping for instance - but it sure took a while.

    Colorado does seem to be slowly waking up, thankfully, but you'll still hear really stupid conversations about it from people who think Kentucky Bluegrass in Colorado is right and natural...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent