85
I hate packaging my software for Linux (fresh) (getfresh.dev)
submitted 3 days ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I seem to recall many years ago having to build some rpm packages. It was really not that difficult iirc. Cant imagine .deb or whatever is all that much harder.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    When I packaged software, I did RPM for Fedora and openSUSE (because that's what I used at that time) but out of curiosity I looked at .deb as well and boy are there weird things there.

    There are many similarities between RPM and pkgbuild for Arch, so I could easily copy almost entire pkgbuilds from AUR and merely adapt a few variables but whatever the inventors of .deb concocted is crazy. Archives within archives and other stuff I actively repressed memories of.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    I looked at .deb as well and boy are there weird things there.

    There are many similarities between RPM and pkgbuild for Arch, so I could easily copy almost entire pkgbuilds from AUR and merely adapt a few variables but whatever the inventors of .deb concocted is crazy.

    That build method dates back super-far, and probably mirrors unix packaging of the day. This is not a good thing, in that it did miss out on some validation features that RPM and NIX have, and that's a problem that hasn't been fixed (in unix or debian) even now (25+ years after we noticed it in the enterprise OS company I worked at, and which invalidated debian even then as a product we wanted to support alongside unix).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent