The choices were:

  • Choice 1: No LLM contributions to Debian via Social Contract

  • Choice 2: Allow AI-Assisted Contributions with conditions

  • Choice 3: Reject LLMs as far as practical, update Code of Conduct

  • Choice 4: Accept AI contributions for Debian specific work

  • Choice 5: Responsible Use of Generative AI

  • Choice 6: A cautious approach to generative AI

  • Choice 7: Debian is created by humans

  • Choice 8: Avoid the use of LLM: climate destruction is a deal breaker

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

There's no getting around it at this point. LLMs are extremely useful tools in the hands of a proficient code-understander (some examples from my own experience here), and we're already at the point where models that run on high-end laptops are useful coding assistants.

Even if openai and anthropic go bust tomorrow - which they might, and they should! - there's still no putting the toothpaste back in the tube.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 15 hours ago

    This is completely correct. I hate the conflation of openai/anthropic with all ai technology. AI companies will go broke in a few years as better on-prem open weight models will destroy their business case, (although whoever ends up owning all the datacenters will be fine since they are valuable in and of themselves) but that will have no impact on those open weight models continuing to exist and continuing to be useful.

  • source
  • parent