The choices were:

  • Choice 1: No LLM contributions to Debian via Social Contract

  • Choice 2: Allow AI-Assisted Contributions with conditions

  • Choice 3: Reject LLMs as far as practical, update Code of Conduct

  • Choice 4: Accept AI contributions for Debian specific work

  • Choice 5: Responsible Use of Generative AI

  • Choice 6: A cautious approach to generative AI

  • Choice 7: Debian is created by humans

  • Choice 8: Avoid the use of LLM: climate destruction is a deal breaker

other discussions
 

Update to https://hexbear.net/post/9402395

The results of the Debian general-resolution vote on the use of large language models have been posted; the winner is choice 5: Responsible Use of Generative AI.

Debian neither endorses nor prohibits the use of generative AI tools in the development, maintenance, or documentation of software, packaging, documentation, and other media published within the Debian Project. We recognize that such tools can substantially improve the productivity of contributors when used responsibly, allowing volunteers to spend more of their limited time on work that requires technical expertise, judgment, review, and collaboration.

The Debian Project nevertheless expects that all contributions submitted to Debian, regardless of how and with which tools they were produced, satisfy the same standards of quality, correctness, maintainability, and legal compliance. The use of a generative AI tool does not diminish the contributor's responsibility for the work they submit. Contributors are expected to understand, review, test, and, where appropriate, modify AI-assisted output before incorporating it into Debian.

It seems like individual maintainers are allowed to make their own decisions based on allowing or disallowing LLM patches. So this seems like Debian is sticking to the status quo for now.

Disappointing, but not the absolute worst thing that could happen since it doesn't enshrine any special rights to LLMs.

Centrism wins again!