cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/44708818

The United States has threatened to oppose Britain's sovereignty over the Falkland Islands if Andy Burnham does not increase defence spending, The Telegraph can reveal.

The proposal is among measures being drawn up by senior defence officials at the Pentagon as an incentive to hit Nato's 5 per cent spending pledge.

A senior US official told The Telegraph that Britain was likely to receive "special attention" in Washington's review of its allies' commitment to Nato, which will examine whether member nations have credible paths toward the target.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Eh, the Falklands are much more complicated than “UK Imperialism”. The locals overwhelmingly want to stay a part of the UK, and the island was pretty much inhabited until European counties started to live there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    Yeah the British and French efforts to colonise the Falklands were probably the least morally questionable act of colonisation ever, since there was no indigenous people there to repress. They genuinely were terra nullius, in the actual original sense not the inhumane imperialist meaning of 'we don't consider the inhabitants human'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    pretty much inhabited

    uninhabited

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Uninhibited? like colonized by Brits trying to escape Victorian prudes' oppression?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments