you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

Not sure if you’re disagreeing or agreeing with me. What I mean is, if a LLM’s output is in practice indistinguishable from human output, fingerprinting some popular services just creates a false sense of security, since we know malicious agents will for sure not fingerprint it.

Isn’t it just better to let humanity accept that a LLM’s output is identical to a person’s and always be skeptical?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    To be honest with you I’m torn on the subject.

    I don’t think it’s fair to abandon the idea that it’s possible to get a reliable fingerprint to differentiate between some hypothetical LLM/NLP AI and humans. I haven’t been convinced it’s impossible to tweak things purposefully to make them inherently produce a fingerprint every single time to help differentiate.

    I just think we need more time, so I guess I’m abstaining?

  • source
  • parent