a man was charged with three felonies after he cut down a 3D-printed "decoy" Flock camera, which was set up by police.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

If they’re fake, how do they know if/when people are tampering with them?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's a trap, they're watching them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    So they can charge them with vandalising a fake piece made of plastic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's still a real physical object being intentionally broken by someone that doesn't own it.

    Keep on mind, I'm absolutely NOT defending it, I'm just explaining the logic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    I understand, but the value of the destroyed ‘object’ is ridiculous so the penalty has to be minimal.

    Edit:

    Oh, and what if the ‘culprit’ just covers the fake camera?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments