847
New Twitter launches, says Musk's X gave up the name (arstechnica.com)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
271 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Get your shortnames while the getting's good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 56 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah i'il keep using mastodon and bluesky, also, they already have investors so it's dead at birth for me

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 66 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Bluesky is also owned by a corporation and, like Twitter, could sell to a fascist billionaire whenever they find it profitable to do so.

    X vs Bluesky is a great microcosm of American team-sports politics. Mastodon is something actually new.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Yeah that's true but perfect is the enemy of good, Mastodon isn't gaining much traction so my hope is that at least we can get a federated protocol, whatever it is

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    Perfect is the enemy of good, but so is the desire for convenience.

    Mastodon gains less traction because it doesn't have an advertising budget, unlike Bluesky. Because Bluesky is owned by a corporation.

    Is Bluesky federated? I thought it wasn't. Tumblr also said they were going to, but then just... didn't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah it does, though it uses their own protocol (ATprotocol) they open sourced it too

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    The AT Protocol was open from the start. It's not the issue and is actually rather clever in parts, in my limited understanding.

    The issue has more been that there was no way to run another server than the main one at first, and then that you could but it couldn't interoperate. I understand this is now something of the past, but I don't think I've ever come across a link to a bluesky post that wasn't on bsky.app.

    Looking a bit into it, it looks like all you need to do is host a Personal Data Server (PDS): https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds?tab=readme-ov-file#self-hosting-a-pds

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    PDS is just one part of the whole thing. It's just the place where your data is stored. Almost all other parts of the network are dependent on Bluesky's stack. Even the alternatives like Blacksky and Eurosky are still dependent of Bluesky's implementations like the Appview. So if Bluesky goes down, it affects the other services (in some way) too. One can host a PDS for cheap, but if you want a proper social media service (with post history, search etc), it is kind of expensive. There are other appviews, but for some reason Bluesky going down causes issues in Blacksky, Eurosky etc

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -11 points 3 days ago* (4 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (3 children)

    After seeing what happened to Twitter following the purchase, I think anyone who buys Bluesky would be very wary about trashing the brand in the same way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago

    Don't just look at the company profits. After Musk bought Twitter, Trump won and Musk gained direct access to the government. I think, that's a pretty good return on the investment.
    But most importantly: Elon now has his own big media company. No longer are the other rich guys ridiculing him because he doesn't have his own media empire. He's now a real full member in the club.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    also, they already have investors so it’s dead at birth for me

    Launching with the immediate intent for profit screams either a scam (Especially with Musk being kind to give up the name, massive red flag).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Smells like deception. Please come to our "New" site with the same name but this one is totally not uncool or handing all your personal info to Musk.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    But spend more money? $8 on that piece of shit "X" site. Fucking joke show.

    But you can pay $20 for the premium instantaneous social media aggregate algorithm site! You'll get all the top paid for profit sponsored posts first before anyone else! Just imagine retweeting your friends minutes before they see this million dollar donated Pepsi ad that is collaborating with Oreo! Whooooaaaaaa! You'll be the most popular person in your friend group for 15 seconds! But make sure you share first or else you'll be ostracized by everyone because you didn't pay an extra $9.99 for ultra fast retweet privilege!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent