you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Which ones are you thinking of? Out of the options I am aware of, Signal seems to be the most secure, most reliable, and most privacy respecting messaging app in this category.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 13 hours ago*

    Used to recommend XMPP (lol) but even with whatever encryption the servers still know and control too much. Like who you are chatting with (entire contact book) and when, plus attachments most of the time. And there was also the jabber ru incident... Don't feel like pulling up the article rn but basically it got MITMed by one of the ISPs (counting the hosting provider as ISP), with a new valid TLS certificate and all.

    Tox supermacy! What looser needs a backlog, pffff.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 child)

    I use deltachat/arcanechat. It uses the mailchat protocol. There's also tox, simplex, matrix, xmpp(conversations) these can do e2e, you can self host it or use a public server, everything distributed through app stores can be compromised. Every app were you rely on a central server can be shutdown. You also don't know how the server software works of for example "signal", what data they collect. Although messages are encrypted you can still log metadata like when where iplocation, with who?

    The problem i guess with thr alternatives is bad service in terms of audio and video chat. The benefit of ms teams for example is their huge cdn. it just works nearly all over the world. Whatsapp/discord is used by so many that it's difficult to stay in contact otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    I've talked to a deltachat dev about this, and the signal protocol is simply technically superior to autocrypt (used by deltachat, etc.). It gives you many more guarantees about things like forward secrecy. There is standardization work to bring these benefits to autocrypt, but it will probably be a while. Signal also has the benefit of having a familiar setup for non-techy people, so it is easier to get people to use in my experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    That's really insightful!

    I use Signal, but still wouldn't mind adding more people to ArcaneChat because frankly, it's more fun. The "apps" functionality and the fact that it works over email protocol is like, fascinating to me. It feels almost like the good old days of Yahoo Messenger, but encrypted! Yay!

    I think it'd still be fine to use for casual use. If OPSEC is ridiculously important, there's always Signal.

    Have to admit, I also kinda hate seeing Signal show up in normiestream news more often lately. 😬

  • source
  • parent