Every time a right winger points and laughs at a socialist who was born rich, it should be understood as a desperate attempt to justify their own moral failure to themselves. If you grew up rich and are now a leftist and someone points that out, the proper response is: “Yes I am. Why aren’t you?” I do not believe that there is any plank in the DSA platform that says that nobody is allowed to live in a brownstone that their dad bought. What they say instead is: If your dad has enough money to buy a brownstone, he should be paying higher taxes so that we can build more affordable housing for people who can’t afford brownstones. A rich kid who nods his head and agrees with that assertion and works to raise taxes on himself in the name of social justice is not guilty of hypocrisy at all. He’s exhibiting a commitment to basic fairness. That’s nothing to be ashamed of. Every rich person is morally obligated to do this. It’s the ones who aren’t class traitors that we need to worry about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

Let me spell it out for you: bringing up Mamdani as a counterexample was a stupid move. You got caught with a bad example and instead of admitting to it and walking it back you doubled down trying to say you were somehow so poor that it still counts as a counterexample.

In short, you're the one who doesn't even know wtf you're saying. And that is the end of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 18 hours ago*

    Okay you seem to have some quite serious comprehension issues or at least memory issues.

    You said:

    I also don't care to be represented by people who have no idea how bad their constituents have it - no matter what team they claim to play for. They don't represent me because they can't comprehend me to begin with.

    Then when I said that was a stupid take and that it doesn't matter what their upbringing was, if they're doing good work and used myself as an example, you threw a fit, changing your argument and making judgemental assumptions.

    You can't even stay consistent in your own arguments and then try to take the superior attitude when you're called out. You're just here to try and sow discontent with actual progressive candidates and make the conservatives more likely to keep control. You're arguing in bad faith or are extremely incapable of logical thought and ThAt iS tHe EnD oF iT.

  • source
  • parent