Citation needed*

• provides no citations for his own dumb ass claims.

Well I'll be the better man I guess... Okkkkkaaay so, first off, I've included a few studies published before the rise of modern ai, one from 2011 making extremely similar claims towards Google searches, but hey I can find more if you really want. Additionally, I'd love to see you work to replace several modern llm integrations with "existing technologies" because I'm here to tell you it cannot fucking be done and I'm willing to cite several fields but why don't you just take a look at mathematics where ai has advanced the field several times over the past few months, or biology where ai has gotten so good at predicting protein fold structures that work for certain requirements that there is literally no alternative technology capable of the same feats.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6866412/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7099936/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wps.20617

https://scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/files/dwegner/files/sparrow_et_al._2011.pdf

https://aiinstitute.hbs.edu/navigating-the-jagged-technological-frontier/