β² 486 βΌ He's clear. (thelemmy.club) submitted 7 hours ago by Lisk91@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world 67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago (1 child) This reads as sarcasm but is generally valid points...? I guess that explains why people downvoted it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 7 points 5 hours ago (1 child) It's valid against ubuntu, but I don't see why it would touch debian users? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago* (2 children) I think maybe you meant "should use Debian"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago I see that reading now. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 point 4 hours ago (1 child) you think Well you see ubuntu is the same as debian so you shouldn't use debian either, because debian also has canonical's snaps, stance on ai, and advertising in the terminal. would work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 hours ago* (1 child) I'm not sure whether you really mean Debian has all those issues or if it's sarcasm, but otherwise it's clearer you're not recommending Debian permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago Debian does not have snaps (I suppose you could install snappy, but that is the case for most distributions). Debian also doesn't have canonical ads in its command outputs. And debian does nor allow LLM contributions to all its related stuff, i.e. debian packaging, software projects, websites, docs, and communication. Generally debian is pretty ai-negative where ubuntu is very ai-positive. So this is continuing the sarcasm because obviously it's all clearly wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redjard@reddthat.com 7 points 5 hours ago (1 child) It's valid against ubuntu, but I don't see why it would touch debian users? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago* (2 children) I think maybe you meant "should use Debian"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago I see that reading now. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 point 4 hours ago (1 child) you think Well you see ubuntu is the same as debian so you shouldn't use debian either, because debian also has canonical's snaps, stance on ai, and advertising in the terminal. would work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 hours ago* (1 child) I'm not sure whether you really mean Debian has all those issues or if it's sarcasm, but otherwise it's clearer you're not recommending Debian permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago Debian does not have snaps (I suppose you could install snappy, but that is the case for most distributions). Debian also doesn't have canonical ads in its command outputs. And debian does nor allow LLM contributions to all its related stuff, i.e. debian packaging, software projects, websites, docs, and communication. Generally debian is pretty ai-negative where ubuntu is very ai-positive. So this is continuing the sarcasm because obviously it's all clearly wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 hours ago* (2 children) I think maybe you meant "should use Debian"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago I see that reading now. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 point 4 hours ago (1 child) you think Well you see ubuntu is the same as debian so you shouldn't use debian either, because debian also has canonical's snaps, stance on ai, and advertising in the terminal. would work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 hours ago* (1 child) I'm not sure whether you really mean Debian has all those issues or if it's sarcasm, but otherwise it's clearer you're not recommending Debian permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago Debian does not have snaps (I suppose you could install snappy, but that is the case for most distributions). Debian also doesn't have canonical ads in its command outputs. And debian does nor allow LLM contributions to all its related stuff, i.e. debian packaging, software projects, websites, docs, and communication. Generally debian is pretty ai-negative where ubuntu is very ai-positive. So this is continuing the sarcasm because obviously it's all clearly wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago I see that reading now. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 point 4 hours ago (1 child) you think Well you see ubuntu is the same as debian so you shouldn't use debian either, because debian also has canonical's snaps, stance on ai, and advertising in the terminal. would work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 hours ago* (1 child) I'm not sure whether you really mean Debian has all those issues or if it's sarcasm, but otherwise it's clearer you're not recommending Debian permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago Debian does not have snaps (I suppose you could install snappy, but that is the case for most distributions). Debian also doesn't have canonical ads in its command outputs. And debian does nor allow LLM contributions to all its related stuff, i.e. debian packaging, software projects, websites, docs, and communication. Generally debian is pretty ai-negative where ubuntu is very ai-positive. So this is continuing the sarcasm because obviously it's all clearly wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 hours ago* (1 child) I'm not sure whether you really mean Debian has all those issues or if it's sarcasm, but otherwise it's clearer you're not recommending Debian permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago Debian does not have snaps (I suppose you could install snappy, but that is the case for most distributions). Debian also doesn't have canonical ads in its command outputs. And debian does nor allow LLM contributions to all its related stuff, i.e. debian packaging, software projects, websites, docs, and communication. Generally debian is pretty ai-negative where ubuntu is very ai-positive. So this is continuing the sarcasm because obviously it's all clearly wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago Debian does not have snaps (I suppose you could install snappy, but that is the case for most distributions). Debian also doesn't have canonical ads in its command outputs. And debian does nor allow LLM contributions to all its related stuff, i.e. debian packaging, software projects, websites, docs, and communication. Generally debian is pretty ai-negative where ubuntu is very ai-positive. So this is continuing the sarcasm because obviously it's all clearly wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
