▲ 120 ▼ Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on mail voting restrictions ahead of midterms (apnews.com) submitted 13 hours ago by AviAdi@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BigMacHole 59 points 12 hours ago (2 children) There's MORE then Enough time to Implement these Changes! -The people who said a YEAR was TOO close to An Election to CONFIRM a Justice! permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago They don't care about hypocrisy permalink fedilink source parent [–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 12 hours ago (1 child) What else do you expect from frauds, liars, and cheaters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago Honestly, I used to expect plausible deniability. I used to expect them to pretend not to be hypocrites and have a good cover story. But I guess, if they don't have to answer to anyone there's no reason to keep up the pretense of consistency permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago They don't care about hypocrisy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 12 hours ago (1 child) What else do you expect from frauds, liars, and cheaters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago Honestly, I used to expect plausible deniability. I used to expect them to pretend not to be hypocrites and have a good cover story. But I guess, if they don't have to answer to anyone there's no reason to keep up the pretense of consistency permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago Honestly, I used to expect plausible deniability. I used to expect them to pretend not to be hypocrites and have a good cover story. But I guess, if they don't have to answer to anyone there's no reason to keep up the pretense of consistency permalink fedilink source parent