you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 8 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (5 children)

    That's like 30% of the problem. Russia has trains everywhere. The rest is just that Henry Ford set up his factories along the border, and we've leaned hard into car-centric development ever since. (Well, actually, we might be turning a corner now, but it's slow)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    i wouldn't say all over russia

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    If you look at the road system in Canada, it's the same pattern, basically. There's a few dirt "highways" that stretch into the northwest, and absolutely nothing connecting the northeast. All the agriculture and so all the sizeable cities are in the south.

    Actually, Russia has a lot more going on up there. As you can see the Russian homeland stretches pretty continuously up, and even in the colonial areas further east, they have mid-sized arctic city Norilsk (that disconnected bit of red). The best we can do is Yellowknife at 10,000.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Everyone lives on the bottom line though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago

    not even that, it's more like the quebec-windsor corridor and friends..
    Between The Corridor and The Praries there's like 2 populated areas, and even around vancouver the population density plunges down a cliff the second you leave the metro area.

  • source
  • parent