• Genus name: Rattus
  • Species name: rattus
  • Subspecies name: rattus

You'd actually say it as R. rattus rattus or Rattus r. rattus.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

Offhand I think that be the case for every/most type species.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

    Not nearly, actually! Exact tautonyms are pretty uncommon, all things considered. Trinomial tautonyms even less so, like Bison bison bison. I don't think I can give you actual data, but I can say knowing a fair bit of marine taxonomy that it's the exception there.


    Edit: It's also prohibited in botany and, I learned today, used to be prohibited for bacteria.


    Edit 2: Wikipedia maintains an incomplete list, incidentally.


    Edit 3: Forgot to mention I was specifically talking about binomial/trinomial tautonyms. Near-tautonyms are very common as you go up toward the middle of the tree of life, e.g. a family, superfamily, and order sharing basically the same name, just with a different prescribed suffix.

  • source
  • parent