you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 24 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

That saying (or, dare I say, thought-terminating clichรฉ) glosses over the consideration of risks and costs that result from its uncritical usage. No sane person should trust it without serious reservations just because it fits the purpose, and that's true whether or not it bears the latest combination of letters peddled by tech bros. It's a dangerous, irresponsible mentality. It's a tool the same way a sledgehammer made out of plutonium is a tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Plutonium sledgehammer sounds fucking awesome though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Pretty effective because of its high density, too. It's a shame it's brittle and would give you heavy metal poisoning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    As ways to die go that also sounds pretty rad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] -3 points 1 day ago

    I mean in an old nuclear bomb that's pretty much the situation. Use a conventional explosive to slam some plutonium like a sledgehammer and nukes have proven to be a strong deterrent when a country had them. Still a tool with a use case

  • source
  • parent
  • Your comment is a sweeping statement that is thought terminating itself.

    No sane person should trust it without serious reservations just because it fits the purpose

    Using a tool for something itโ€™s intended for automatically involves some thought process. And this thought process also involves its limitations and potential for danger.

    Your criticism stems from your dislike for AI and your opinion that itโ€™s generally not useful. An opinion that is shared widely here, but with little to no proof at all.

  • source
  • parent