You are literally going “I TREAT BOTH EQUALLY” and then do nothing but pump Russia and their talking points

That's because you completely accept one side's narrative, despite having nothing to back it up, so anything that challenges that one-sided view you just label as a "Russian talking point."

You have not levied a single criticism equally in the direction of any of the other three in that image.

That's a blatant lie. I criticized Russia's invasion and accused them of doing the exact same thing that I accused the US of. Plenty of actually pro-Russia people would take issue with that, and say that their armed men with guns are the real expression of popular support and the other side is just a foreign puppet, exactly the way you do in reverse.

Unless I see a reason why I should trust one group of armed men seizing government buildings more than the other, then it's perfectly reasonable to regard both claims with equal skepticism.

The main reason you're turning to these accusations and talking about ending the discussion is because you can't answer the simple question I posed, which is how we know the faction in the west legitimately represents the people's will. I'm assuming the answer is that the media told you so and you never thought to critically examine it. So now we have all this bullshit to hide the fact that you don't have an answer.

Every single step of the way I have been equally critical of the US and pointed out their actions are the same as Russia does

Lol, no you haven't. You're depicting the US as heroically coming to the rescue of a poor, defenseless country that's fully democratic and representive of the popular will, while possibly having an ulterior motive for doing so, while Russia is depicted as using proxies to seize territory in a brazen attempt at expansionism. This despite the fact that there is nothing you can point to to actually demonstrate that the Western-backed faction is any less of a proxy or any more of a legitimate representation of popular will. Like I said, when the conversation hits that point, you just hastily change the subject and start throwing out baseless accusations.

Just the same as you treat everything: It isn’t liberal unless you agree, it isn’t democracy unless you say so, it is fair if you say it is fair. You’re like a five year old.

To be clear, the policies I was mentioning, like ending the war in Afghanistan, were popular policies. It's not the fact that the US government doesn't respond to my, personal views that makes it not a democracy, it's the fact that it does not respond to what the people in general want.

A “marxist” who supports authoritarianism.

Lol, and I suppose you either haven't read Engles or don't consider him a Marxist either. Next you'll be telling me that Marx himself wasn't a Marxist. Nevermind the fact that this "support for authoritarianism" is just something you made up to get out of answering a difficult question.