839
Chinese video platform Bilibili is going global to challenge Youtube (www.engadget.com)
submitted 1 week ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
370 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The China-centric video sharing platform is expanding with a new international app and an English version of its website -- with no identity verification (for now at least)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

This just means rich individuals decide what people see instead of states. It doesn't result in education.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I think its the same problem with the press on TV and print form. Rich individuals can buy up all press outlets and control the narrative. Its hard (and restrictive) to broadcast on TV and print. On the internet, at least the freedom to publish and access information has a low barrier to entry. A rich individual may buy one lemmy instance, can they buy them all? Can they buy its successor? The lower barrier and less restrictive nature of the internet (or how it should be) is too fast moving for them to compete imo. All the states need to do is educate people on how to consume media correctly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    A rich individual may buy one lemmy instance, can they buy them all?

    Yes, easily. Additionally, they can control the search engines which lead there or not, the commonly used platforms for code sharing so that development is more difficult, and so forth. They have an incredible advantage through economy of scale. The barrier to entry for putting any information on the internet may not be very high, but making it findable and accessible has a very high barrier, and relies on corporate-controlled platforms.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    I think the better question is will they be able to buy them all. Buying implies the other party is willing to sell.

    Its true that this information will be harder to access if not indexed properly, but word of mouth is a good backup for that. I didn't find lemmy from google, someone (non corporate entity) posted a link to it somewhere. Now, that 'somewhere' may be corporate controlled and ban certain links but I'd argue that will just split the internet into two (a corporate side and "free" side) with little cooperation between them and I don't think anyone will be able to keep people from either side - as long as the internet remains neutral.

    I think its just too hard to completely control information unless you are a nation state (and even then).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent