▲ 839 ▼ Chinese video platform Bilibili is going global to challenge Youtube (www.engadget.com) submitted 1 month ago by artifex@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 367 comments fedilink hide all child comments The China-centric video sharing platform is expanding with a new international app and an English version of its website -- with no identity verification (for now at least)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 125 points 1 month ago (10 children) BRB, gonna upload something about Tianaamen Square. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) They will just remove it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 48 points 1 month ago (2 children) Thatsthejoke.info permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) site not found permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago Great firewall strikes again permalink fedilink source parent [+] stumu415@lemmy.zip -16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children) Same old shit, different day. Can't you find anything original? Post something negative about ICE on YouTube or something negative about Israel. I got perma banned from reddit because of my comment that all the ICE traitors will never get their sign on bonus - which they haven't - and after this is all over, they will have to go back to sucking immigrant cock behind the dollar store. So don't talk to me about propaganda and censorship. Western tech companies are just as bad if not worse. Especially Twitter or X or Y or whatever that shit is called, doesn't know the first thing about free speech. Not that surprising if the owner does a Hitler salute. Edit: one last thing. How much better is the American TikTok after it was taken over by another right wing company? Yeah, I thought so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (3 children) Believe it or not, two separate things can both be bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] stumu415@lemmy.zip -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) So should an article about a Chinese app not automatically get the 'Tiananmen square' response. Or any article about China for that matter. Like a Pavlov reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemmynated@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago Should an article about a Chinese app not get a comment about Chinese censorship? No. It’s highly relevant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago The what response? permalink fedilink source parent [–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago The scale is different. There are tons of videos on social media right now that are thinly veiled instructions on how to destroy flock cameras. Something like that would NOT fly in china. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) They will just remove it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 48 points 1 month ago (2 children) Thatsthejoke.info permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) site not found permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago Great firewall strikes again permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 48 points 1 month ago (2 children) Thatsthejoke.info permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) site not found permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago Great firewall strikes again permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) site not found permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago Great firewall strikes again permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago Great firewall strikes again permalink fedilink source parent
[+] stumu415@lemmy.zip -16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children) Same old shit, different day. Can't you find anything original? Post something negative about ICE on YouTube or something negative about Israel. I got perma banned from reddit because of my comment that all the ICE traitors will never get their sign on bonus - which they haven't - and after this is all over, they will have to go back to sucking immigrant cock behind the dollar store. So don't talk to me about propaganda and censorship. Western tech companies are just as bad if not worse. Especially Twitter or X or Y or whatever that shit is called, doesn't know the first thing about free speech. Not that surprising if the owner does a Hitler salute. Edit: one last thing. How much better is the American TikTok after it was taken over by another right wing company? Yeah, I thought so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (3 children) Believe it or not, two separate things can both be bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] stumu415@lemmy.zip -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) So should an article about a Chinese app not automatically get the 'Tiananmen square' response. Or any article about China for that matter. Like a Pavlov reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemmynated@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago Should an article about a Chinese app not get a comment about Chinese censorship? No. It’s highly relevant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago The what response? permalink fedilink source parent [–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago The scale is different. There are tons of videos on social media right now that are thinly veiled instructions on how to destroy flock cameras. Something like that would NOT fly in china. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (3 children) Believe it or not, two separate things can both be bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] stumu415@lemmy.zip -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) So should an article about a Chinese app not automatically get the 'Tiananmen square' response. Or any article about China for that matter. Like a Pavlov reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemmynated@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago Should an article about a Chinese app not get a comment about Chinese censorship? No. It’s highly relevant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago The what response? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] stumu415@lemmy.zip -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) So should an article about a Chinese app not automatically get the 'Tiananmen square' response. Or any article about China for that matter. Like a Pavlov reaction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemmynated@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago Should an article about a Chinese app not get a comment about Chinese censorship? No. It’s highly relevant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago The what response? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lemmynated@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago Should an article about a Chinese app not get a comment about Chinese censorship? No. It’s highly relevant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago The scale is different. There are tons of videos on social media right now that are thinly veiled instructions on how to destroy flock cameras. Something like that would NOT fly in china. permalink fedilink source parent