79
Google co-founder Sergey Brin has now spent $100 million to fight the billionaire tax (techcrunch.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/usa@midwest.social
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

Let's say someone steal $1k from you.

You know it's them, you go and confront them, and ask for your money back.

They tell you to piss off and refuse to give your money back

You call the cops, and then the thief finally offers you $20 if you leave them alone...

They're only offering the $20 because if the cops show up they may have to pay back all $1k and actually go to jail.

What's happening right now, is the oligarchs are offering us $20, so we stop asking for me because we're making progress

It ain't enough, because all their wealth belongs to us.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm confused by the analogy and that last part. How do you mean they've stolen money from us and "all" their wealth belongs to us? Could you elaborate there a bit?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    How do you mean they’ve stolen money from us and “all” their wealth belongs to us?

    Wealth is finite.

    70 years ago, the wealth that billionaires currently have was in circulation, the rest of us would be paid it, and subsequently spend it, which would then be used to pay others.

    That is what the (now mythical) "self sustaining economy" is.

    Instead, the same small number of people take huge chunks of wealth out of circulation, they may invest in the stock market, but stock prices increases don't get used to pay salaries, they only translate to money if cashed out.

    So in the pursuit of raising stock prices, more and more wealth is removed from circulation

    Wealth inequality is when a few remove an oversized amount of wealth from circulation, which is stealing from the rest of us

    If someone "earned" a billion dollars and spent it, that wouldn't be such a big deal.

    The problem is that wealth being removed from circulation making it literally inaccessible to anyone else unless we unite and take it as a society, done peacefully this is called "taxation".

    When that stops being an option, historically there are other options

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    I don't know if I agree with the reasoning here. This is more an inherent problem with capitalism, right? You have to sell goods and services for a profit. But if everyone makes a profit, the money will lose value, and there will be winners and losers. The winners will continue to be bigger and bigger winners, and the losers likewise in the other direction. Throw in the stock market and you've got a recipe for disaster.

    But I don't know if I agree that the money is "ours". Rather, a reasonable portion of it should be shared for the benefit of all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    This is more an inherent problem with capitalism, right? You have to sell goods and services for a profit. But if everyone makes a profit, the money will lose value, and there will be winners and losers. The winners will continue to be bigger and bigger winners, and the losers likewise in the other direction. Throw in the stock market and you’ve got a recipe for disaster.

    That's unregulated capitalism...

    Where people are able to accumulate significantly more wealth and that snowballs on its own.

    For most of America's history, once people started accumulating that level of wealth, we started taxing the shit out of them, up to 94% just like a century ago.

    But I don’t know if I agree that the money is “ours”. Rather, a reasonable portion of it should be shared for the benefit of all.

    "Ours" as in society's....

    Would you agree that the purpose of money is to facilitate that exchange of goods and services amongst members of a society?

    Or do you think it should be used as a competition to see who can accumulate the most even well after the point they could spend it all if they tried to?

    Because people die if they don't have money, the obsessive co pulsives could just go collect beanie babies or pokemon, pretty much anything else other than the one thing society depends on to function without having to revert to the fucking barter system

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent