Selfhosted

hideshow 8 child comments

parent

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 child)

You can always self host forgejo, but yeah, codeberg is an opinionated place, I suspect primarily due to resource constraints. Not a github replacement and not really trying to be.

parent

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I do run a local instance but what I do is then replicate certain repos out to Github and Codeberg. (The ones I like to keep public)

parent

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

Yeah, I don't think I have a codeberg going at the moment because I want to do CC4NC.

There's like some scripts I don't mind people making derived commercial works since they're fucking tiny, but other than that, I don't want people getting rich off my code.

parent

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago

I also have lots of scripts I find handy but would never share. I just need a safe third party to host it.

parent

[–] PhenomenJan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Radicle is awesome, but having to create a new account for each device is a pain, especially if you want them all to have access to the same private repo.

parent

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

Doesn't allow you to use AI with your repos

You say that like it's a bad thing, that's a EXCELLENT THING, get the slop outta open source

parent

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

That's completely irrational but you do you. Maintaining documentation is one of the best and safest uses for LLMs in coding - devs generally write bad documentation because they don't want to do it.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

You say irrational, I say it's rational not to trust the predictive text on steroids that often just makes shit up.

parent

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 point 6 days ago (1 child)

I say irrational because clearly there is a bias here and not an experience being referenced.

parent

https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-copilot-election-questions-misinformation-2024-2

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 6 days ago

So you're saying they never hallucinate? Ever?

I have evidence to the contrary;

https://www.cmswire.com/customer-experience/ai-in-customer-service-billion-dollar-mistake-when-deployed-wrong/

https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2025/10/28/lawyers-ai-hallucinations-chatgpt/

https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-ai-chatbot-bard-offers-inaccurate-information-company-ad-2023-02-08/

https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/lawyer-who-cited-cases-concocted-by-ai-asks-judge-spare-sanctions-2023-06-08/

https://www.envive.ai/post/case-study-of-air-canadas-chatbot

parent

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

Literally just use doxygen. You don't ever need LLMs for docu.

parent

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 point 6 days ago* (1 child)

doxygen

There is zero chance for getting this approved to use in our Enterprise.

We have an existing tool that can do this without assessing another tool.

parent

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 days ago (1 child)

There is zero chance for a FOSS, offline tool that uses a decades-established formatting and annotation system, but there is 100 dicksuck on AI?

Wow... get your resume ready to migrate.

parent

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 point 5 days ago

Correct, if we have something included in a contract we already have there is little reason for us to procure a FOSS tool and maintain a security understanding of said tool and maintain versions.

Organisation of 60K. Job is far too senior, lucrative and actually very enjoyable to consider moving over a puerile thing.