you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 39 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

Tools are just tools; there are good ways and bad ways to use them. "Grok, go find bugs in the Linux kernel" isn't a good one. This isn't hard to understand...

There were many, partially well-intentioned, mostly fame-seeking, one-off 'projects' 'scanning' public repos and flooding them with low-quality low-effort PRs and issues; things that no human ever read until the a maintainer did.

"They made a poison and sold us a cure" is absolutely a valid criticism; that's two sides of the same coin. But pretending that he's being hypocritical or that LLMs aren't useful is just being wrong for the sake of hating AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • AI is useful as tool like he said, unfortunately these days in many organisations it is used as a replacement rather than a tool.

    His conclusion was that as AI tools get more capable, the people who actually understand how systems work become more valuable, not less — because someone still has to review, maintain, and take responsibility for what the tools produce.

    Humans still need to learn how to code.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Tools are just tools

    I don't think that's true, but we simply disagree on that.

    I don't think he's hypocritical. He simply doesn't have to deal with that negative impact he "warns" about. He is in support of using it as a tool and thinks the criticism is invalid. That's a consistent perspective, even if I don't agree with it.

    If he used LLMs to create bug reports, but also complained about LLM written bug reports he gets, that would be hypocritical.

  • source
  • parent