74
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

please tell me they're prioritizing minimizing the existential cost of the climate catastrophe over the $ cost

I'm sure you know that's not the case. It's always about the money.

That said, I would guess that these function similarly to hybrid car engines. Electric motors are better at providing a quick or variable torque rsponse and gas engines are most efficient running at a constant RPM. Put those properties together and you get an electric motor designed for takeoff and large altitude changes, and a gas motor designed for maintaining cruising speed.

Essentially, the exact opposite of what you wanted.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

I'm pretty sure it's exactly that. Electric engines during takeoff and landing would also decrease noise pollution near humans.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
74 points (97.4% liked)

science

28459 readers
486 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS