323
Why Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agents (www.wired.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
195 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

I know Gemini isn't the top. It's all I'm willing to tolerate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    That doesn’t make any sense.:

    „This sub-par product of an evil mega corporation that uses their market power to shove this product down everyone’s throat is all I’m willing to tolerate.“

    As bad as Antrophic and openAI are, their product is better and they don’t embed it into phones and search engines. (Not saying they wouldnt‘t if they have the chance, but they haven’t)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    It makes sense. I'm not spending a dime.... I'm not signing up and giving my credentials out to any other AI ... I already have Google . Gemini is good enough for the things I look up monus occasionally being dead wrong which all of them can do. I don't make stupid memes or videos.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Yeah okay. I understand the monetary angle.

    However I also have never spent a dime on AI, and I don’t use Gemini. I run Qwen3.6 on my graphics card, or use opencodes free tier. Deepseek-v4- flash is pretty good.

    I’ve read a comment recently that Googles local Gemma models hallucinate less than Gemini, but I don’t know if that’s true, since I hardly use Gemma and Gemini not at all.

    I recommend downloading some local models and a harness like pi or opencode if you want to play around an have the hardware for it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent