you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 56 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Completely vibe-coded project it seems, even documentation. And yet:

Human-Origin Source License

Also love this:

You may not, without prior written permission from the Author:

- ship or maintain a modified version outside the contribution-purpose
  rules;
- maintain a divergent private or internal fork;
- port, clone, rebrand, or recreate the Covered Software;
- create an API-compatible replacement, behavioral clone, competing
  implementation, or Derivative Implementation; or
- use AI-assisted implementation mining to create, improve, test,
  document, or validate a Derivative Implementation.

Look, I use AI too (mostly to speed things up by working on multiple items in parallel), but I'm not gonna stuff "human-origin source license" on anything I use it for, nor do I think creating API-compatible replacements, competing implementations, etc, should reasonably be possible to block with a license... Also, quite literally, he's creating tools for reverse engineering, which in itself is generally in breach of the license of whatever software is being reverse engineered. Fuck off and use a FOSS license, whether it be permissive or copyleft...

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago
    - ship or maintain a modified version outside the contribution-purpose
      rules;
    - maintain a divergent private or internal fork;
    - port, clone, rebrand, or recreate the Covered Software;
    - create an API-compatible replacement, behavioral clone, competing
      implementation, or Derivative Implementation; 
    

    At that point why bother making your codebase public?

  • source
  • parent