14
The case for a blatantly discriminatory Australian voting system (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 month ago* by to c/australianpolitics@aussie.zone
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

My preferred method is to weight votes according to age: voters below, say, 30 would receive a more heavily weighted vote, voters 30 to 60 would get a less weighted vote, and those over 60 would retain their current single vote. For argument’s sake, you could multiply the vote of under-30s by 1.3 and that of 30- to 60-year-olds by 1.1. People’s ballot papers could be distinguished by colour – under-30s get blue, 30s to 60s green and oldies red – to make counting easier on election night.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

“Australians can’t be trusted to vote, instead they should vote for someone who certainly cannot be trusted”

Politicians are the same people who support Israel, are in bed with LLM data centres, do jack shit on climate issues, focus on corporations over people, etc.

More often than not politicians act against the wishes of Australians.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    That is true because the majority of politicians are right wing (including the alp), yet the people still keep voting for them.

    it is the same as blaming billionaires and corporations for everything wrong in the world, many of them are definitely bad, but it is the people who fund them by using their products and services. Blaming them changes nothing, they don't really care about the blame, as long as they still get your money.

    If you want a better world, be a better person, boycott dodgy companies, don't vote for dodgy politicians. There has been a decent choice on every single ballot that I have ever seen, they are surrounded by bad choices, but they are there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent