you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Statcounter doesn't have sophisticated bot detection like Cloudflare. Look at Cloudflare's stats for the same period and filter for "likely human". The percentage craters back to reality. So while I think "The loading times on headless alone would give them away." is total bullshit, they can still be detectable using other heuristics and an awful lot of machine learning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    StatCounter is hosted on Cloudflare DNS but if you've got more information about their data sources I could check if those filter bots as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    StatCounter are their own data source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    Statcounter monitors traffic on every website that implements it, the majority of those are likely Cloudflare or similar DNS, but we don't really know for sure.

    The source is NOT people who visit Statcounter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    What does DNS have to do with anything? DNS isn't involved in this data gathering. Cloudflare uses DNS to enable proxying, proxying is how they gather OS data.

    Statcounter's data is from visitors to pages with their JS embedded. That's their whole business model. No one said it was visitors to the Statcounter website iself.

    Have you considered that you might not actually know what you're talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You not knowing what a DNS is in this context or what CloudFlare does sort of makes a reasonable response impossible without typing multiple paragraphs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments