cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/50323460

For more information, either visit the article directly or view the post with quotes in !crimes_of_ice@lemmy.4d2.org

https://lemmy.4d2.org/post/4543830

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Unless it significantly says existing public opinion and creates action I wouldn't call it explosive?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I agree that the facts in this article are not excessively interesting. It's just garden variety racism.

    The real audience for this prelim injunction is not the public, however. It's the 9 justices of the supreme court. In particular, there are 2-3 justices who appear to get all their facts from Fox News. And the evidence introduced for this prelim injunction is the ACLU's primary opportunity to challenge the Fox News "facts" with "alternative" facts, when this case goes back up to the supreme court.

  • source
  • parent