608
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

As in, doing worse economically. In this context, where that's clear, it seems like the wording holds up.

(or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr)

GDP measures actual trade more than the stock market. That being said, yes, it's a litmus test, albeit a decently well supported one. The main places it breaks down, in terms of predicting people's lifestyles, is where there's major banking hubs (Singapore, Seychelles, Ireland for a while).

[-] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 1 points 4 hours ago

GDP is absolute values, so there's quite a bit of self reinforcement. Especially in service heavy areas, your massage cost 30$ for half an hour, elsewhere you can get a better one for 10$ an hour.

Although the second economy delivered twice the goods at a higher quality, the economic output was 1/3rd

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
608 points (99.2% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

6271 readers
744 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS