▲ 200 ▼ Signal is working on registration without a phone number. But what form will it take? (aboutsignal.com) submitted 1 month ago by unglueclass23@programming.dev to c/privacy@programming.dev 77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) Bullllllllshit. They've said that for years. It's easy to do. But they won't do it permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] XLE@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago (1 child) How's it easy? Not the technical part (which definitely looks as easy as just dropping a requirement), but the spam/abuse prevention part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -4 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond. Anyway, it's not an issue on Wire or SimpleX or the dozens of other platforms that don't require phone numbers. It's obviously a solved problem. Signal is just making up fake excuses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's pretty easy to detect spam. Tell that to... any social media. Lol. If was easy to detect bot you think they not big problem anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Social media is different from a platform that's literally just DMs. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sina@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) It’s pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond. It's not so easy, because you could even register a new account for each new spam message, or register 100k accounts & only send out 3 messages a day / account.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Obviously not. Because this isn't an issue elsewhere permalink fedilink source parent [–] arin@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) No need, using https://keet.io/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -3 points 1 month ago So, no asynchronous messaging? Kinda kills it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] XLE@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago (1 child) How's it easy? Not the technical part (which definitely looks as easy as just dropping a requirement), but the spam/abuse prevention part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -4 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond. Anyway, it's not an issue on Wire or SimpleX or the dozens of other platforms that don't require phone numbers. It's obviously a solved problem. Signal is just making up fake excuses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's pretty easy to detect spam. Tell that to... any social media. Lol. If was easy to detect bot you think they not big problem anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Social media is different from a platform that's literally just DMs. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sina@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) It’s pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond. It's not so easy, because you could even register a new account for each new spam message, or register 100k accounts & only send out 3 messages a day / account.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Obviously not. Because this isn't an issue elsewhere permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -4 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond. Anyway, it's not an issue on Wire or SimpleX or the dozens of other platforms that don't require phone numbers. It's obviously a solved problem. Signal is just making up fake excuses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's pretty easy to detect spam. Tell that to... any social media. Lol. If was easy to detect bot you think they not big problem anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Social media is different from a platform that's literally just DMs. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sina@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) It’s pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond. It's not so easy, because you could even register a new account for each new spam message, or register 100k accounts & only send out 3 messages a day / account.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Obviously not. Because this isn't an issue elsewhere permalink fedilink source parent
[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's pretty easy to detect spam. Tell that to... any social media. Lol. If was easy to detect bot you think they not big problem anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Social media is different from a platform that's literally just DMs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Social media is different from a platform that's literally just DMs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sina@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) It’s pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond. It's not so easy, because you could even register a new account for each new spam message, or register 100k accounts & only send out 3 messages a day / account.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Obviously not. Because this isn't an issue elsewhere permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago Obviously not. Because this isn't an issue elsewhere permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arin@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) No need, using https://keet.io/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -3 points 1 month ago So, no asynchronous messaging? Kinda kills it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -3 points 1 month ago So, no asynchronous messaging? Kinda kills it. permalink fedilink source parent