Technology

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

While useful, I would not want my device to be constantly pinging every device around it with wifi, bluetooth, or whatever other radio signal, on the off chance it might catch someone wearing the most groucho marx looking spyglasses on the planet when my own eyes can do that for me.

If not for the sake of my battery life, then for the same reason why I dont leave my bluetooth or wifi on- less avenues for people nearby to gain easy remote access to my device.

parent

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

Yeah, I don't think that's how you'd use it.

You'd see some weirdo in wayfarers and load up the app to check. Simple.

parent

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

I don't even trust the "only give permission to use [camera/mic/bluetooth/location] while the app is active" setting.

I would not enter a public space with my phone lit up like a EM Christmas tree, sonar pinging every receiver in sight.

Let alone giving some rando app the access to every piece of NFC/radio comms on the off chance it can positively identify someone's spy glasses, because that means if they are, ive just given their spy glasses my phone's identifiers, and I'm spending more time near them and more time to possibly end up on some shady company's panopticon server.

It's like the people suggesting shining a laser into a flock camera, it might destroy a bit of the sensor, but they've also put a highly visible beam of light directly from themselves to it.

parent

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)

I don't think the app does that, it's scanning for pings, not sending out pings. Listening for signals from Meta glasses.... it's not listening to connect with anything, it's just passively listening. Also it only uses blue tooth... I don't know what you're going on about with radio and internet signals.

parent

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/14/opinion/bluetooth-wireless-tracking-privacy.html

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

So you have to leave bluetooth on, which means your device is broadcasting an active bluetooth signal.

If any random shop can use any phone's active bluetooth to track and profile every user that's i side or nearby, I don't want to have bluetooth active when in public. Genuinely not worth it just to fi d some glasshole pervert when my own eyes can do the job without giving away any more of my data. That's what I'm on about.

parent

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

So you have to leave Bluetooth on

No, you can spot a weirdo turn blue tooth on and confirm it, then turn it off.

Look, I don't think this app is for someone like you.

parent

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 month ago

Oh I know it isn't, because I trust google as far as I can throw a datacenter.

But I'm still struggling to see the use of an app that makes you stop and go "let me ask my app to turn on my remote connection feature and search to see if this person is wearing the pervert glasses." instead of using my eyes and going "That guy looks like he's wearing pervert glasses, I'm leaving the area."

parent

[–] SpeakerToLampposts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

iOS version: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/nearby-glasses-original/id6761056896

I see some others in the iOS app store that claim to detect nearby "smart" glasses via BLE. I have not tested any of them, so I have no opinion on their usefulness, reliability, privacy, etc:

Nearby Glasses (same name, different app): https://apps.apple.com/us/app/nearby-glasses/id6776279207
Nearby Lens: Glasses Detector: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/nearby-lens-glasses-detector/id6760046620
NoGlasshole: Glasses Detector: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/noglasshole-glasses-detector/id6760988897
Nearby Glasses Ray-Ban Scanner (in-app subscription required): https://apps.apple.com/us/app/nearby-glasses-ray-ban-scanner/id6760216782