198
Virgin Markdown, HTML vs chad plain Text (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Change my mind.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

the things which are added to plaintext to make HTML make parsing simpler for the computer and more difficult for the human

This is the crux of where we disagree. <title> exists to be human readable. A machine would be happier with a binary identifier.

A human does not need additional training to utilize every character in a Markdown file

Uhh ask any non-tech person to write a markdown file. This simply is not true.

A header 2 tag (h2) in HTML requires no more training than a header 2 tag (##) in Markdown. They both exist to make it easier for a human to dictate to a machine what should happen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    <title> exists to be human readable.

    The text within <title> exists to be human readable, but the tag itself exists so that the browser application knows what to put in the title bar.

    Uhh ask any non-tech person to write a markdown file. This simply is not true.

    Write, sure. But I meant read.

    A header 2 tag (h2) in HTML requires no more training than a header 2 tag (##) in Markdown.

    I did mention that that was one of the more bilaterally semantic parts of the language, alongside emphasis and strong tags. But I still think the ## is easier for a regular user to understand.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    If <title> isn't intended to be human readable, why not use \0 instead? Every tag could be 2-3 characters, saving space and increasing machine processing speed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    This is the entire argument I'm making. HTML makes compromises that makes it harder for the human to read and also harder (or at least less optimal) for the machine to read. Markdown codifies an existing human-readable format in a way that a machine can handle easily, too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent