▲ 274 ▼ FreeBSD Just Removed The Last Of Its GPL-Licensed Code (hackaday.com) submitted 2 months ago by 0x0@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] 712@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 months ago (3 children) What does this mean? Can someone explain in simple terms? permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 24 points 2 months ago (2 children) BSD is a permissive license that allows sometime to take the code and update/change it as they see fit. There are no requirements to publish those changes, and I believe you can license it under a different license. GPL on the other hand does require that you publish your changes, and that those changes also be licensed under GPL. Thus also requires that a company does due diligence and states what pieces of code they used were GPL and give credit So in removing the last bit of GPL code, someone can take FreeBSD and do whatever they want without having to worry about what pieces of code might fall under different licenses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* The only requirement of the BSD license is you credit the code somewhere in a disclosure. That's pretty much it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 712@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 months ago Thank you. I like the GPL idea more, to be honest. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 24 points 2 months ago (2 children) BSD is a permissive license that allows sometime to take the code and update/change it as they see fit. There are no requirements to publish those changes, and I believe you can license it under a different license. GPL on the other hand does require that you publish your changes, and that those changes also be licensed under GPL. Thus also requires that a company does due diligence and states what pieces of code they used were GPL and give credit So in removing the last bit of GPL code, someone can take FreeBSD and do whatever they want without having to worry about what pieces of code might fall under different licenses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* The only requirement of the BSD license is you credit the code somewhere in a disclosure. That's pretty much it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 712@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 months ago Thank you. I like the GPL idea more, to be honest. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* The only requirement of the BSD license is you credit the code somewhere in a disclosure. That's pretty much it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 712@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 months ago Thank you. I like the GPL idea more, to be honest. permalink fedilink source parent