you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

It allows freebsd to be true to the BSD license, and I agree with the author that it makes licensing easier. BSD will always be free and incredibly permissive, and I don't see this changing anything. But a lot of the strides that linux has made is because people need to release their changes.

BSD on the other hand doesn't require giving back, so you get Apple that was the largest company in the world building off of the work of FreeBSD. I certainly don't see FreeBSD being comparable to macOS like Fedora is to RHEL. It's more like Apple took what they wanted and walked away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Counterpoint: Apple used (uses?) a lot of GPL code as well, but their “giving back” was so perfunctory that the community didn’t incorporate most of it.

    Big companies will always find ways to skirt what is allowed in ways that benefits them alone.

  • source
  • parent