this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026

31 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

7,254 readers

2,788 active

58 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.

If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.

Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.

Country prefix

Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago

moderators

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

World's first 10,800 car carrier with solar power delivered by China (interestingengineering.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Lemmynated@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Nor does it even seem to cover a significant portion of auxiliary needs

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Except it does.

This power helps run the ship’s operations, lowering fuel use and making the ship more energy efficient.

This is textbook peak shaving. Not to mention the engineering feat of integrating solar with LNG for this cargo application.

Hopping into the comments to decry the ship for not doing full propulsion via solar just shows your ignorance. It's like complaining about a hammer for not being able to screw in a fastener.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] DoomProphet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

It's just greenwashing. Companies do it all the time. Slapp some solar on it or use some insignificant amount of recycling and you got your press release which lazy journalist just have to copy. That lead to clickbait articles.

And if you're being honest you're just defending it because the "by China" in the title.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago

Accusations of greenwashing are different than accusations of bad engineering. That's a different conversation.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

This is an odd strawman to construct

doing full propulsion via solar just shows your ignorance

The only ignorant person here my friend is you, nobody has said or suggested such a thing

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Soo, then why did you characterize the solar power as being inadequate for propulsion? That is a meaningless thing to point out - given how the solar is not intended for propulsion. What was your original point?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago

You sound pretty mad bro

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4