684
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

You don't seem to understand how this works. You try to publish they shut you down and put you in prison and your story still didn't see daylight you're just some dude in prison likely in solitary.

You're not wrong but being shitty doesn't change the fact they would end up in jail and accomplish nothing, no one here seems to be giving Americans a pass we're just aware you have to pick your fights.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

This isn't the 1800s anymore, you post online and people WILL see it

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

No. If they know who you are you aren't posting. They control the pipeline, if they had no idea what was going to happen that might apply it just doesn't in this case.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

That's why there's never been any leaks. Totally nobody named Edward Snowden or anything like that, totally impossible to post shit....

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

You're lighting the fact snowden is exiled to avoid imprisonment for what's likely to be life and even that ignores the death threats and attempts.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Then DON’T LARP AS A JOURNALIST. Stay home and get a safe fuckoff job.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

So you're a journalist then right? Right? You wouldn't be running your mouth like that while sitting on your ass doing nothing about it would you? No.... That would be crazy huh?

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Right. It's impossible to get information into the public's hands.

Journalism exists for no more important reason than to be a check on powerful, dangerous people. Third degree burns are also “no fun,” but firefighters exist.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

No, it's impractical to do so without escaping the country or going to prison.

Your example makes no sense, putting out fires is legal, nonpolitical, encouraged and as far as I'm aware there's no time place manner limitations on it either.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

You are part of the problem. In a big way, even.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

Oh but not you? You have the solutions and your vocal about it but aren't actually a journalist, funny that.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
684 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30525 readers
3327 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS