▲ 588 ▼ Tech debt can stay in the backlog (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 month ago by hasanhaja@lemmy.ml to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 53 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32026330
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (4 children) Also: no ledger board on the house side of that deck. Even with proper post support, it's still a widowmaker. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago* (3 children) No leger board is a good thing in this case, probably means it's built as a cantilever setup like this And the tiny supports probably aren't needed at all and they just made a funny photo. Edit: i have no idea if that far of a span is appropriate for that type of cantilever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) That would explain the use of 2x12 (2x10 maybe?) lumber and how it kinda disappears into the house past the siding. Still, I wouldn't want that lumber exposed to the elements like that - it's like asking for moisture to penetrate the structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago Yeah, the bare wood is certainly a choice if that carries through into the house. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago While I'm confident this is what is shown in OP's pic, I'd still want support posts under a girder at the edge. Over-build it the first time and be done with it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago* (3 children) No leger board is a good thing in this case, probably means it's built as a cantilever setup like this And the tiny supports probably aren't needed at all and they just made a funny photo. Edit: i have no idea if that far of a span is appropriate for that type of cantilever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) That would explain the use of 2x12 (2x10 maybe?) lumber and how it kinda disappears into the house past the siding. Still, I wouldn't want that lumber exposed to the elements like that - it's like asking for moisture to penetrate the structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago Yeah, the bare wood is certainly a choice if that carries through into the house. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago While I'm confident this is what is shown in OP's pic, I'd still want support posts under a girder at the edge. Over-build it the first time and be done with it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) That would explain the use of 2x12 (2x10 maybe?) lumber and how it kinda disappears into the house past the siding. Still, I wouldn't want that lumber exposed to the elements like that - it's like asking for moisture to penetrate the structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago Yeah, the bare wood is certainly a choice if that carries through into the house. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago Yeah, the bare wood is certainly a choice if that carries through into the house. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago While I'm confident this is what is shown in OP's pic, I'd still want support posts under a girder at the edge. Over-build it the first time and be done with it. permalink fedilink source parent