Friday’s appeals court ruling in the New Jersey case goes further than a July 2024 ruling from a federal judge, who said that the state’s ban on AR-15s specifically was unconstitutional but upheld the provision barring larger magazines.

The third US circuit court of appeals said on Friday in its opinion that the state’s ban on all semiautomatic rifles it deems to be “assault firearms” and its restriction on “large capacity ammunition magazines” were unconstitutional.

New Jersey’s attorney general, Jennifer Davenport, a Democrat whose office defended the law, told the Associated Press that the decision is “as unfortunate as it is legally incorrect”.

"Gotta maximize the body count of school children"

-These judges, probably

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 18 points 2 months ago (80 children)
  • [–] [S] 14 points 1 month ago* (61 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (54 children)

    And those modifications are already illegal for any semi auto firearm.

    It's just a 5.56 (usually) semi auto rifle. There are others that aren't AR-15s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (51 children)

    And those modifications are already illegal for any semi auto firearm.

    The modification being illegal isn't much of a deterent to mass murderers.

    The only real effective way to limit their scope of killing is to limit their access to the underlying tool: the AR15. Someone's scope of killing by modifying a 9mm handgun with extended grip =/= modifying an AR15 with extended grip. They differ in all sorts of capabilities: accuracy, capacity, recoil, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)