317
US boxer Hannah Rapp struck and killed by driver while cycling, police say (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

From the article - "The agency said Rapp and a fellow bicyclist were riding on a local road when Medina passed them in his car, stopped, and drove his vehicle in reverse. Medina then hit Rapp, and she was pronounced dead after emergency responders brought her to a hospital."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 3 months ago (10 children)

It all hinges on the intent to kill. I'm sure he now would say he didn't intend to kill. just to hit them and teach them to stay off the road. They have enough to charge them with both. And let a jury sort it out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Saying you intended to hit someone with a motor vehicle is saying to intended to kill them, unless you're provably insane and don't understand that hitting someone is likely to kill.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Even a legally "insane" defendant would most often be found to have met the "knowing" criteria; the bar is that of foresight or knowledge (including constructed knowledge in some jurisdictions) of "merely" physical harm that is likely to cause grievous injury or death. No metaphysics required.

    For example, acting to cause the stoppage of breath (that "happened" to result in death) is an automatic pass for murder in many common law countries.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    Agreed, intent is hard to prove. That's why the law also says, "knowingly." He definitely knew he could kill someone by hitting them with his car.

    The man had priors for reckless driving, according to the article. And a bunch of other things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    ianal, but I don't think they could be charged with both murder and manslaughter. Wouldn't that violate double jeopardy? Otherwise there would be absurdities where people get charged with the whole spectrum of criminal intent just to see what sticks. (Which does totally happen anyway, when they can get away with it.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    If there’s skid marks, he better get upgraded charges. He has a history of this shit too:

    Those jail records also showed prior arrests for Medina on counts such as deadly conduct by discharging a firearm, assault causing bodily injury, and reckless driving. Dispositions for those cases were not immediately available.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent