I said less, not none. That particular AI will give the relevant page citation(s) for any stat or claim it makes so you can correct for errors, but obviously that doesn’t account for any data it just skipped so there’s still a possibility for errors of omission.

I’ll also note, as I think this is an under appreciated aspect of the AI narrative, is my wife is not some AI sycophant. She hates when people use AI to “write” an email. However, she is horrendously understaffed and gets way too much work dumped on her because she’s the only one that seems to have any institutional knowledge and gets things done without drama. So she’d love to go through these documents manually. But when you’ve got eight proposals dumped on your desk, each hundreds of pages of dense technical details, and are told “get them all evaluated by the end of the week,” there’s not much of an option there. When there’s more fallout from not getting the review done in time than there is from some bad data making it through the analysis of the AI summary, it’s not surprising that people are using it out of necessity.