you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 158 points 3 years ago (6 children)

A private vpn is an oxymoron. Since you tunnel all your data to some server.

Google and privacy is an oxymoron.

"Google private vpn" would be a mega oxymoron.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Not really. What if it's your VPN? Mine allows me access to my home network, which is its primary focus, but it also obfuscates what my phone is doing online, and blocks trackers.

    (Adguard home and wireguard)

    It also lets me use my phone on 4chan... so there's that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    If you're of the few people on earth to care enough and knows enough to set it's own vpn, sure. but otherwise, NordVPN gonna still sponsor youtubers and lure people into a false sense of privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Strps to set up my own VPN:

    1. Navigate to my router’s configuration page
    2. Select Configure VPN server
    3. Click Generate Certificate button
    4. Download certificate
    5. Enable VPN networking on my device
    6. Import downloaded certificate

    It’s that simple. If you don’t have your own firewall, you can just deploy Tailscale on all devices you want to be able to communicate with each other, which uses Wireguard under the hood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    As someone who manages a tailscale network at my work...I just want to point out that tailscale is a tiny bit more complicated than just downloading and installing. Not much but...

    That said the ability to automate wireguard connections is wonderful and everyone should check it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I thought Nord was one of the ones that doesn't keep activity logs, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I don't have any evidence to the contrary, but in general it's suspicious when a company markets features like that so hard when there's no reliable way an outsider can verify that the claim is accurate (still)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    “Private” in “virtual private network” means “routed by different rules”. It’s the same “private” that’s in “private Internet Protocol addresses”.

    It was never about personal privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    It's an oximoron in every company which make money with surveillance advertisings. Google undoubtedly has apps and services with a very high quality and often without real competition or alternative, but this has a very high cost and if the main income, apart from some paid services, is based on selling user data to advertising companies, it is logical and almost inevitable that it becomes a data moloch that uses any dirty trick to obtain these. It is an axiom: power corrupts

    Mozilla now regrets having signed with Google as a sponsor and is now trying to get out of this contract, especially since Google plans to introduce this WEI DRM, but Alphabet is not doing this the easy way and Mozilla depends a lot on this money to maintain its infrastructure. We will see what comes of this, but it is really urgent that Mozilla changes its business model, it would be very desirable and necessary.

    Moral: If you want to maintain your independence and freedom, do not accept outside investors

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments